Your Stateless Society Needs YOU!

Printer-friendly versionSend to friendPDF version

By the wonders of the interwebs I was chatting on Facebook with a friend from school I hadn’t been in touch with for more than quarter of a century last night (that does make me feel old!). We had discovered via a Facebook alumni group that another of our number is an ex Royal Marines colonel and Special Boat Service chief and now “head of global security” at a private security and defence contractor and I made a comment about him maybe being a good person to have known when we finally reject coercive government and become a private law society.

My friend quickly replied that he had read Hans-Herman Hoppe, who has made “Private Law Society” his signature phrase to describe a stateless society (i.e. one based on the private competitive production of law and security rather than the monopolistic state legislative law), and we got chatting off the group for a while. Needless to say I was delighted to find someone else, and one of my best friends at that back in the day, thinking along the same lines as me.

And as we were chatting about whether, and how, we might one day be rid of coercive government, we got stuck on just how we could get from here to there. And whilst I suggested a few possible approaches that I’ll get onto, we did I think conclude that there is no one way, and that the process of delegitimising the violent state and building new civil society (or “Freed Market” as I prefer it) institutions to take over some current functions, would take the work of all sorts of people with many different skills, interests and motivations.

Not everyone, for example, who takes us a step toward eradicating the state from our lives need have that ultimate aim in mind. They need not share my belief, say, that however much some state intervention may be well-intentioned, and even though some of it might do a little good, those goods cannot outweigh the bads the monopoly of force causes in other areas.

They may simply believe that they can see a way of doing one thing better than the state in one area of life that particularly interests them. One might hope, though, that if they believe this about their pet policy area, they may accept that other people with a background in other areas might also be right. In other words if they expect the rest of us to accept their professional judgement in one area, they might at least reciprocate that belief when someone in another area proposes something.

Yes, there are what we might call “big ticket items” like political philosophers delegitimising the democratic political state as much as possible, economists discrediting (what an appropriate pun!) the fraudulent and destructive money system, but it also means novelists spinning yarns about possible futures; technologists building mechanisms to get round state intrusion in our lives or platforms in which new forms of society can develop; entrepreneurs and lawyers developing less confrontational and monopolistic arbitration systems.

It means educators learning from their own experiences and developing new pedagogies and curricula fit for people who may very well live well into the twenty-second century; creators of knowledge and art finding ways to make money out of their workwithout handing a big share to media oligarchs. And it means people in neighbourhoods and communities up and down the land telling bureaucrats that they can take responsibility for their own local affairs.

And what that all means is that everyone potentially has a part to play in achieving a stateless society. To use an old and perhaps tired analogy: how does one eat an elephant? Well, maybe it’s not one bite at a time but that one gets a lot of other hungry people round to help!

Is it just the line of least resistance that we continue to vote for and so legitimise politicians who to most of us appear to be useless at best and venal liars at worst when they tell us they can achieve these things better that we can if we just give them our support?

4
Average: 4 (1 vote)
Your rating: None

More recent mutterings...

8th Apr 2012
A comment on a Lib Dem Voice post about whether the state should borrow heavily or not to invest in “infrastructure” that would produce valuable state assets has got me a bit riled. Commenter “RC” wrote in response to a previous comment I had made: “Can I ask, have you studied economics at university level? I’m just curious because I can’t believe anyone who had studied the subject in any depth or breadth and had to justify their arguments in relation to actual facts could actually believe in Hayekian theories.” Now, I readily...
11 comment(s)    read the whole thing...
3rd Apr 2012
So, I’ve sat through nine weeks now of Macroeconomics lectures and seminars: there’s not many of us who have not missed a week! I’ve turned in what must rank as the weakest essay in defence of orthodox macroeconomic monetary policy imaginable. And only now have I discovered the perfect antidote to this fiction in the form of Detlev Schlichter’s “Paper Money Collapse: The Folly of Elastic Money and the Coming Monetary Breakdown.” If that sounds a little apocalyptic I can say I am three quarters of the way through so far and have not reached the...
3 comment(s)    read the whole thing...
3rd Apr 2012
I’m sure I’ve quoted this before in a post but it seems apposite again in these dark days of tales of yet more government noseying about in our private business. Lest you think the state’s desire to spy on its citizens is anything new the following was penned by one of my political heroes Pierre-Joseph Proudhon, in his “General Idea of the Revolution in the Nineteenth Century” in 1851: “To be GOVERNED is to be kept in sight, inspected, spied upon, directed, law-driven, numbered, enrolled, indoctrinated, preached at, controlled, estimated, valued,...
1 comment(s)    read the whole thing...
1st Apr 2012
Before I restart blogging on economics and politics and the like, a quick one on the saga that is Morals Bar. Rumour has reached me that the reason for the bar closing has something to do with a relationship gone wrong between two people somehow involved in managing or running the bar. Well, I suppose the gossip mill was bound to create its own version of events, but I’m afraid the reason for the bars’ demise (and I use the apostrophe there deliberately because you cannot separate the closure of Morals from the earlier closure of Harts or the Venue at Headington Hill and...
read the whole thing...
blogging
1st Apr 2012
It’s been a quiet month, chez moi, having put myself in a coursework procrastination purdah. And it was only on loading all my previous posts into my new copy of MacJournal, that I discovered that my previous post was in fact my thousandth blog post. Now, I’m neither cruel nor conceited enough to think that there are any posts in those six years’ worth that you really need to read again. In fact as I look back there are a fair few I’d be somewhat embarrassed to write nowadays (my enthusiastic support for Chris Huhne perhaps most notable!). But I did think it...
1 comment(s)    read the whole thing...
27th Feb 2012
Those foolhardy few who have read my blogs since inception or thereabouts will know that I have written in the past complaining about the loss of what one might call "Staff Common Room" facilities at Brookes, with the loss of the Lloyd Common Room and then no plans to provide anything similar - a private space reserved for staff meals, events and R&R - in the New Library and Teaching Building.  At the same time the SU fought and lost a not very wholehearted battle to get a "proper SU" social facility in the new building too.  And at the weekend I wrote...
read the whole thing...
26th Feb 2012
At the beginning of this semester, about a month ago now, the Students' Union invited us to "celebrate" twenty years' service to the community of, first, Morrell Hall, and latterly Clive Booth Student Village, by Morals Bar by announcing it was to close permanently at the end of this semester. I decided at the time not to write an outraged post or try to form a campaign myself to persuade them otherwise because I was heartened that within a few days of that announcement a group of students resident in one of the old Morrell Hall blocks had been to the union's...
3 comment(s)    read the whole thing...
19th Feb 2012
A couple of weeks ago I found out just how out on a limb I am politically, as if I wasn't already pretty much aware.  I was in an excruciating lecture - nothing to do with the lecturer, or the room, or, I suppose, the content in the sense that it was all pretty standard Political Science 101 stuff.  But therein lies the problem: it may be mainstream, but fundamentally I find I disagree with almost all of it.  We were learning about "the State": what it is, when it came into being, what its essential functions or institutions are, on what rests its legitimacy and...
1 comment(s)    read the whole thing...
12th Feb 2012
Normally I wouldn't want to lend such a misguided group even the few atoms of the oxygen of publicity this blog can offer, but maybe, since oxygen is lethal at high concentrations, this contribution might help to ensure that the breach of trade descriptions that is the new "Liberal Left" group in the Lib Dems is stillborn in the poisonous compound it creates from both words. For unless they are simply caving into the pressure of Americanisation and the gross corruption of our political language and landscape that has caused (ably assisted by oxy-morons such as "Liberal...
6 comment(s)    read the whole thing...
Syndicate content
Printed (hosted) by M5Hosting , San Diego, CA 92122, USA. Published and Promoted by Jock Coats , OXFORD, OX3 0FF. The views expressed are those of Jock Coats and any other contributors, and not M5Hosting. Developed using the Drupal Content Management System on Debian GNU/Linux servers. Theme by Jock Coats, from a heavily modified Drupal Zen template.