Anarchism is not a romantic fable but the hardheaded realization, based on five thousand years of experience, that we cannot entrust the management of our lives to kings, priests, politicians, generals, and county commissioners.
Q: When is a druggie not a druggie?
A: Before the government bans their legal substance of choice...
It was probably too good to be true, a "legal high" giving similar effects to ecstasy. And so it proves to be. The government, following orders from the bansturbators at Euro High Command (who says we still have control of our own domestic laws any longer?) is to move to ban BZP, Benzylpiperazine. According to the Guardian it is likely to become a class C substance by the end of the year:
Move to ban stimulant BZP | Science | The Guardian:
Owen Bowcott
The Guardian, Tuesday March 4 2008 Article history
BZP, a psychoactive stimulant promoted as a legal alternative to ecstasy and amphetamines, is to be banned in Britain. The government's advisory committee on the misuse of drugs will today begin the process of making it a controlled substance, following a recommendation from the European Union. It is likely to become a class C drug before the end of the year. BZP was once almost marketed as an antidepressant until its similarity to amphetamines was noted. It has been associated with vomiting, anxiety, insomnia, mood swings and seizures. It is already a controlled drug in eight EU countries. The EU action is binding and requires all EU member states to take legal action within a year. There has been no direct evidence of BZP causing death, although it has been linked to several fatalities in the UK.
I haven't tried it yet. I was going to a few weeks ago when I felt a bit down and thought it might be safer than trying to get a black market ecstasy tablet or some MDMA - it's really good for social situations that make me nervous and where I would not want to get drunk just to be able to strike up a conversation with strangers.
The whole sorry saga highlights just how idiotic the drugs laws are, and in particular the British classification system that Jacqui Smith has recently re-inforced with her deadly new death strategy. If BZP becomes a class C drug, while those it seeks to emulate are class B, amphetamines, and class A the even less harmful MDMA/ecstasy, where is the science behind that? Yup, you're right, there isn't any.
They may as well make sugar and chocolate class Bs on a whim if you ask me. Both are "linked" to several thousand fatalities each year in the UK. There's better science there it seems to me to justify that. But more than this, no doubt the search will go on for another substance, as yet uncontrolled, that will give similar effects, and the drugs laws will play catch up once again after legal businesses have built up a good trade in unadulterated doses because they can operate in country in clean, clinical lab factories and not kitchen top clandestine chemistry sets.
Related reading
Here are some stories that may be on related subjects, based on the tags used in this post:
- UPDATED: Who is the real Nutt?
- Cannabis: the evil weed?
- Chris Grayling and state sanctioned murder
- There is no such thing as a safe horse
- The Minister for Drugs (Legalization, Regulation and Taxation thereof)
- Mephedrone panic: a perfect example of media hype and manipulation
- Shameful: Before going off to beg for your votes, they vote to kill your children
- Retoxification: yes, you read that - state policy to wean prisoners ONTO drugs
- Drug policy must be an election issue
- The last bridge, a straw too far; Should I stay or should I go now?

Main articles or...
All comments 
via Feedburner
Random Blogroll Links
About Jock

Name: Jock Coats
Age: 40s
Lives: Oxford, UK
Works: IT Support, Oxford Brookes University, where I am also a Governor of the University and a Warden in a hall of residence.
I am a card carrying Lib Dem, but am a confirmed market-anarchist, of the US Individualist Anarchists or Mutualist tradition. Other passions are social enterprise, monetary reform and housing. See full profile and contact form and at the following web-haunts:
Others' Magnificent Mutterings



















Comments
They're not at the forefornt of bansturbators on drugs policy. Lib Dems have quite a sound policy, unless it has been unilaterally updated by the powers that be (wouldn't put it past them!) - on decriminalizing where possible, renegotiating treaties or finding ways of working within them and crucially of moving to an evidence based classification system which would include all psychoactives so you could see whether your tipple was more or less lethal than what we currently call legal drugs.
I am a bit disappointed in the whole Libertarian manifesto to be honest. I know that I am more libertarian than those who seek to temper their libertarian instincts in the name of getting elected. The book we're writing will, I think, show that there's not a fag paper to put between proper liberal economic policies and proper libertarian ones. How could there be if one's favourite liberal author is Herbert Spencer!